 |
|
|
European Alcohol Policy: Poland
Background -
| Respondent's name: |
MELLIBRUDA JERZY |
| Respondent's country: |
Poland |
| Respondent's e-mail address: |
jurekm@onet.pl |
| Respondent's telephone number: |
+480601237170 |
| Respondent's fax number: |
No data entered |
| Respondent's present work: |
Academician |
| Organisation, position, address (name and number of street, postal code, town): |
Institute of Health Psychology.
ul.Gęślarska 3
02-412 Warszawa Poland.
www.ipz.edu.pl
|
| Organisation website: |
|
| Are you a government employee? |
No |
| Professional qualifications: |
professor dr hab.
PhD |
| Number of years in employment in your professional area: |
30 |
| Self-rating of expertise level in the area of alcohol control policy in your country (1 is slightly conversant, 10 is fully conversant): 10 |
| Self-rating of expertise level in the area of the prevention of the harm done by alcohol in your country (1 is slightly conversant, 10 is fully conversant): 9 |
| If you are answering for a jurisdictional region rather than as a country as a whole, which jurisdictional region is it? |
No data entered |
If this questionnaire was completed with the collaboration
of other people, provide organisational reference(s) for each participant.
|
Provide organisational reference(s) for nation-wide and/or
regional coalitions (task forces, action groups, collaborative bodies) in
the arena of alcohol control policy.
|
| Other background information: |
No data entered |
Politics, policies and priorities -
| Do relevant politicians/policy makers refer to alcohol control policy in a manner that suggests it is a priority area? |
Yes, in documents |
| Do relevant politicians/policy makers refer to the prevention of the harm done by alcohol in a
manner that suggests it is a priority area? |
Yes, in documents |
| In your opinion, taking into account everything you know,
what level of real priority does the present government place on alcohol control policy? (1 is low priority, mostly rhetoric; 10 is high priority, much action) |
3 |
| In your opinion, taking into account everything you know,
what level of real priority does the present government place on the prevention of the harm done by alcohol? (1 is low priority, mostly rhetoric; 10 is high priority, much action) |
5 |
| What is the recent trend (past several years) in resource allocation to
alcohol control policy and programmes to prevent the harm done by alcohol? |
No or little change in resources |
|
What was the amount of funds allocated to alcohol control policy and programmes to prevent the harm done by alcohol in the most recent national budget (Euro):
|
No data entered |
| Budget year: |
No data entered |
| National level, governmental policy documents on alcohol policy and on preventing the harm done by alcohol been published in the following areas:
|
Drinking and driving.
Document references:
National Programme for Alcohol Problems Preventiona
Education and public awareness.
Availability of alcohol, including licensing.
Sales to minors.
Alcohol advertising, promotion and sponsorship.
Help and treatment for alcohol problems.
Help and treatment for family members.
|
| Regional level, governmental policy documents on alcohol policy and on preventing the harm done by alcohol have been published in the following areas: |
|
|
| Non-governmental (private enterprise, research institute, NGO, etc.) policy
documents on alcohol control policy and programmes to prevent the harm done by alcohol have been published in the following areas: |
|
|
Name up to five of the most senior government officials with responsibility
to oversee/manage alcohol control policy and the prevention of the harm done by alcohol.
|
Evaluation -
| Are national alcohol control policy and programmes to prevent the harm done by alcohol policies evaluated and reported? |
Yes |
Knowledge development -
Provide organisational reference(s) for the
principal bodies (e.g. academic bodies, public health laboratories, agencies,
government units) that are involved in developing the knowledge base for alcohol control and prevention policies.
|
Implementation -
Provide organisational references
for the principal bodies (main providers) that are involved in implementing
intervention programmes and other actions for alcohol control policy.
|
Information dissemination -
Provide organisational references for the principal
bodies that are involved in information dissemination and other actions
to keep health care professionals informed about managing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption and alcohol dependence.
|
Programmes -
| How available are programmes for preventing the harm done by alcohol? Provide document
reference(s) for some of the key programmes that exemplify high quality. (1 is not available; 5 is widely available) |
Public education through mass media
|
No data entered |
| |
Comprehensive community based
|
No data entered |
| |
Home/family
|
No data entered |
| |
School
|
No data entered |
| |
College
|
No data entered |
| |
University
|
No data entered |
| |
Work place
|
No data entered |
| |
Primary health care
|
No data entered |
| |
Hospital/clinic
|
No data entered |
| |
Internet
|
No data entered |
| |
Social welfare and youth services
|
No data entered |
| |
Custodial settings (prisons, probation, etc.)
|
No data entered |
| |
| Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional workforce -
Is higher education in alcohol control policy and/or the prevention of the harm done by alcohol available from at least one institution of higher
education?
No
|
Funding -
| Are funds dedicated to alcohol control policy and programmes to prevent the harm done by alcohol clearly identifiable in the most recent national budget? |
Yes |
|
The arena/activities are indicated for which earmarked funds are provided:
|
Governmental Centre(s) and/or institutes
Non-governmental Centres (s) and/or institutes
Community prevention programmes
School, college, university-based educational programmes
Health care based programmes
Health professional education
Conference(s), workshops, seminars, symposia, etc. |
| Are funds dedicated to alcohol control policy and/or programmes to prevent the harm done by alcohol clearly identifiable
in the budgets of non-governmental institutions (foundations, private institutes, welfare societies, professional groups, etc, associations)? |
Yes |
|
The arena/activities are indicated for which earmarked funds are provided:
|
Governmental Centre(s) and/or institutes
Non-governmental Centres (s) and/or institutes
Community prevention programmes
School, college, university-based educational programmes
Health care based programmes
Health professional education
Conference(s), workshops, seminars, symposia, etc. |
Personal evaluation of the state of the field -
| List up to five key recent advances in your country
related to alcohol control policy: |
- No data entered - No data entered - No data entered - No data entered - No data entered |
| List up to five key recent
advances in your country related to the prevention of the harm done by alcohol: |
- No data entered - No data entered - No data entered - No data entered - No data entered |
| List up to five key barriers/obstacles/issues
that stand in the way of achieving, in
your country, action on alcohol control policy: |
- No data entered - No data entered - No data entered - No data entered - No data entered |
| List up to five key barriers/obstacles/issues
that stand in the way of achieving, in
your country, action on the prevention of the harm done by alcohol: |
- No data entered - No data entered - No data entered - No data entered - No data entered |
| List, in descending order of importance, up to
five key advances that are needed to support implementation of evidence-based alcohol control policy in your country: |
- No data entered - No data entered - No data entered - No data entered - No data entered |
| List, in descending order of importance, up to five key changes that are needed in
your country, to achieve the advances above: |
- No data entered - No data entered - No data entered - No data entered - No data entered |
| List, in descending order of importance, up to five key advances that are needed to
support implementation of evidence-based the prevention of the harm done by alcohol in your
country: |
- No data entered - No data entered - No data entered - No data entered - No data entered |
| List, in descending order of importance, up to five key changes that are needed in
your country, to achieve the advances above: |
- No data entered - No data entered - No data entered - No data entered - No data entered |
List up to ten persons who you believe are important for action on alcohol control policy and the prevention of the harm done by alcohol in your country.
|
Comments
Inclusive dates of data entry
| From: 1-1-1970 To: 1-1-1970 |
|
|