 |
|
|
European Alcohol Policy: Estonia
Background -
| Respondent's name: |
Beekmann, Lauri |
| Respondent's country: |
Estonia |
| Respondent's e-mail address: |
lauri@ave.ee |
| Respondent's telephone number: |
3725261884 |
| Respondent's fax number: |
No data entered |
| Respondent's present work: |
Manager/Administrator |
| Organisation, position, address (name and number of street, postal code, town): |
Estonian Temperance Union, executive director, Mere pst 20, 10111, Tallinn. www.ave.ee |
| Organisation website: |
|
| Are you a government employee? |
No |
| Professional qualifications: |
journalist |
| Number of years in employment in your professional area: |
6 |
| Self-rating of expertise level in the area of alcohol control policy in your country (1 is slightly conversant, 10 is fully conversant): 6 |
| Self-rating of expertise level in the area of the prevention of the harm done by alcohol in your country (1 is slightly conversant, 10 is fully conversant): 7 |
| If you are answering for a jurisdictional region rather than as a country as a whole, which jurisdictional region is it? |
No data entered |
If this questionnaire was completed with the collaboration
of other people, provide organisational reference(s) for each participant.
Organisational references:
Estonian Temperance Union
Kuressaare city government
|
Provide organisational reference(s) for nation-wide and/or
regional coalitions (task forces, action groups, collaborative bodies) in
the arena of alcohol control policy.
Organisational references:
Estonian Temperance Union
|
| Other background information: |
No data entered |
Politics, policies and priorities -
| Do relevant politicians/policy makers refer to alcohol control policy in a manner that suggests it is a priority area? |
Yes, in documents |
Document references: Coalition Agreement of the Estonian Republic
| Do relevant politicians/policy makers refer to the prevention of the harm done by alcohol in a
manner that suggests it is a priority area? |
Yes, in documents |
Document references: Coalition Agreement of the Estonian Republic
| In your opinion, taking into account everything you know,
what level of real priority does the present government place on alcohol control policy? (1 is low priority, mostly rhetoric; 10 is high priority, much action) |
4 |
| In your opinion, taking into account everything you know,
what level of real priority does the present government place on the prevention of the harm done by alcohol? (1 is low priority, mostly rhetoric; 10 is high priority, much action) |
4 |
| What is the recent trend (past several years) in resource allocation to
alcohol control policy and programmes to prevent the harm done by alcohol? |
Large decrease in resources |
|
What was the amount of funds allocated to alcohol control policy and programmes to prevent the harm done by alcohol in the most recent national budget (Euro):
|
No data entered |
| Budget year: |
No data entered |
| National level, governmental policy documents on alcohol policy and on preventing the harm done by alcohol been published in the following areas:
|
Drinking and driving.
Document references:
Traffic Law
Taxation of alcohol products.
Document references:
New Act on Alcohol Excise Tax
Availability of alcohol, including licensing.
Document references:
Alcohol Law
Sales to minors.
Document references:
Alcohol Law amendment
Alcohol advertising, promotion and sponsorship.
Document references:
Advertising Law
|
Evaluation -
| Are national alcohol control policy and programmes to prevent the harm done by alcohol policies evaluated and reported? |
No |
Programmes -
| How available are programmes for preventing the harm done by alcohol? Provide document
reference(s) for some of the key programmes that exemplify high quality. (1 is not available; 5 is widely available) |
Public education through mass media
|
1 |
| |
Comprehensive community based
|
1 |
| |
Home/family
|
1 |
| |
School
Document references:
Minimazing damage done by alcohol |
2 |
| |
College
|
1 |
| |
University
|
1 |
| |
Work place
|
1 |
| |
Primary health care
|
1 |
| |
Hospital/clinic
|
1 |
| |
Internet
Document references:
www.promill.ee |
1 |
| |
Social welfare and youth services
|
2 |
| |
Custodial settings (prisons, probation, etc.)
Document references:
Anonymos Alcoholics |
2 |
| |
| Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional workforce -
Is higher education in alcohol control policy and/or the prevention of the harm done by alcohol available from at least one institution of higher
education?
No
|
Funding -
| Are funds dedicated to alcohol control policy and programmes to prevent the harm done by alcohol clearly identifiable in the most recent national budget? |
Funds are available for alcohol, but mixed in with other funding and hard or impossible to link explicitly with alcohol. |
|
The arena/activities are indicated for which earmarked funds are provided:
|
|
|
| Are funds dedicated to alcohol control policy and/or programmes to prevent the harm done by alcohol clearly identifiable
in the budgets of non-governmental institutions (foundations, private institutes, welfare societies, professional groups, etc, associations)? |
Yes |
Personal evaluation of the state of the field -
| List up to five key recent advances in your country
related to alcohol control policy: |
- Parliament accepted the ban for selling alcohol on the streets (kiosks etc). - Parliament accepted the bill that makes alcohol sale to minor a criminal act. Punishment upt to one year imprisonment. - Timelimits for alcohol selling in different town and county governments. - Increased media attention on alcohol policy in Estonia. - No data entered |
| List up to five key recent
advances in your country related to the prevention of the harm done by alcohol: |
- Previously mentioned jurisdictional changes in Estonia. - Reestablishment of the Estonian Temperance Union and the work it has started. - Public attention on the subject. Although statistics show that harm done by alcohol increases. - Police have created a new department and one of its assignments is fighting against drunkdriving. - No data entered |
| List up to five key barriers/obstacles/issues
that stand in the way of achieving, in
your country, action on alcohol control policy: |
- Overall mentality of the people, politicians included. Poor understanding of the harm done by the alcohol. - Activity of the alcohol industry. They influence media by the advertising and policy makers by business and political relations. - Unableness to uphold the laws that excist at the moment. It works as an argument against new and stricter laws. - No data entered - No data entered |
| List up to five key barriers/obstacles/issues
that stand in the way of achieving, in
your country, action on the prevention of the harm done by alcohol: |
- A widespread opinion on alcohol as a product for everyday life. Poor understanding of harm done by alcohol. - Influence of TV and other media to the adolescents. Media presents a youthculture where alcohol is a normal part. - Funds from alcohol excise taxes does not go for public health work. - Weak alcohol policy. - No data entered |
| List, in descending order of importance, up to
five key advances that are needed to support implementation of evidence-based alcohol control policy in your country: |
- Governmental commission for elaboration of the evidence based alcohol policy for Estonia. The Commission has to include members of the Government and the Parliament, specialists on alcohol problems and health promotion, physicians, sociologists and educators. - Subcommissions for supplying the governmental commission by facts on the alcohol situation and the European experience of the alcohol policy. - Educational courses for members of government and Parliament on the alcohol problems and on experience in the regulation of the alcohol situation. - No data entered - No data entered |
| List, in descending order of importance, up to five key changes that are needed in
your country, to achieve the advances above: |
- Evidence based analysis of regional experience in limitation of alcohol sale. - Evidence based analysis of experience in anti-alcohol education in schools. - Financual backup for the nongovernmental organisations dealing with tasks listed in 11.5.2, 11.5.3, 11.6.1 and 11.6.2. - No data entered - No data entered |
| List, in descending order of importance, up to five key advances that are needed to
support implementation of evidence-based the prevention of the harm done by alcohol in your
country: |
- State program for prevention of alcoholism and alcohol dependence. - Attitude change among population:
- alcohol is not for everyday life
- Being drunken is disgraceful
- Pregnant women and mothers should avoid alcohol totally
- children should grow up free of alcohol
- everybody has freedom to determine his/her attitude to alcohol but everybody is responsible for harm resulted by alcohol consumption. - No data entered - No data entered - No data entered |
| List, in descending order of importance, up to five key changes that are needed in
your country, to achieve the advances above: |
- Active distribution of knowledge of alcohol and harms resulted by alcohol consumption using public lectures, forums, media etc. - Special alternative media, introducing alcohol and drugfree lifestyle: radio- and TVshows, newspaper. - Courses for parents, pregnant women, teachers and social workers. - Improvement of health education in schools. - No data entered |
Comments
| 2.6 - in 2005 there are no funds for alcohol control policy and programmes. All funds went for drug- and HIV-prevention. Entry form did not accept that answer (0 kroons).
In 2.8 we brought some examples of the regional decisions of selling timelimits. Most of the regional administrations have followed that lead.
8 - Programmes. As you can see the situation is really poor. There are drugprevetion programmes that involve a little also alcohol subject.
|
Inclusive dates of data entry
| From: 1-1-2000 To: 1-4-2005 |
|
|